Australian regulator delays decision on Google-Fitbit merger
Australian
regulator delays decision on Google-Fitbit merger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb383/bb3836501d989e4fa60e5e142a7156574c8f9fe2" alt="Australian regulator delays decision on Google-Fitbit merger"
Australia’s competition regulator on
Tuesday delayed for three months its decision on Google’s plan to buy fitness
gadget maker Fitbit for $2.1 billion despite the European Union giving conditional
approval to the deal.
The European
Union regulators last week approved the deal after Google promised to restrict
user data and ensure Android phones work with other wearable devices for at
least 10 years.
But the
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said it was not prepared to
accept a similar court-enforceable undertaking from the Silicon Valley tech
giant.
“We are not
satisfied that a long term behavioral undertaking of this type in such a
complex and dynamic industry could be effectively monitored and enforced in
Australia,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said in a statement.
“The ACCC
continues to have concerns that Google’s acquisition of Fitbit may result in
Fitbit’s rivals, other than Apple, being squeezed out of the wearables market,
as they are reliant on Google’s Android system and other Google services to
make their devices work effectively,” he added.
The ACCC would
continue its investigation and set March 25 as its decision date, he said.
Google said in a
statement it was disappointed at the delay but would continue to engage with
the ACCC to answer the regulators’ questions.
Sims said his
concerns about the deal were aligned with those of the U.S. Department of
Justice than those of the European Union.
Australia wanted
to see what the U.S. decided before making its own decision, Sims said.
The EU decision
was largely focused on Google’s use of data, he said.
“We at the ACCC
and the D.o.J have a very different theory of harm,” Sims told Australian
Broadcasting Corp.
“We’re concerned
that if Google gets hold of Fitbit, that could mean, just like you’ve got a bit
of a duopoly with apps, you’d have a duopoly with wearables, which in our view
would significantly reduce competition,” he added.
Human rights and
consumer groups have called on authorities to block the deal over privacy and
antitrust concerns.
Comments
Post a Comment